- From: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 12:30:16 +0200
- To: "Adrien de Croy" <adrien@qbik.com>
- Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas.mailhot@laposte.net>, "Martin Thomson" <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "HTTP Working Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Le Mer 24 juin 2015 12:03, Adrien de Croy a écrit : > > I think the problem scenario is the active network attacker between the > client and the proxy. > > Since the client to proxy connection is not secured, This is another thing that will need fixing sooner rather than later > It does seem a shame that all the millions of real corporate proxy users > need to suffer because of paranoia over a vanishingly small possibility > of an active network attacker. Let's be honest here, the current setup is intended to punish users that use proxies, and nothing else. Otherwise 511 would have gotten some traction. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2015 10:31:09 UTC