- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 10:57:17 +1000
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Suggestion: below the quoted text: "Because each alternative is considered fully authoritative for the origin, they can themselves advertise alternative services - including alternatives that outlive the original advertisement from the origin." > On 8 Jun 2015, at 11:40 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/74> > > This issue is asking whether the intent is to allow an alternative service to successfully advertise a further alternative. > > I note that our spec already says: > >> If a client becomes aware of multiple alternative services, it MAY >> choose the most suitable according to its own criteria (again, >> keeping security properties in mind). For example, an origin might >> advertise multiple alternative services to notify clients of support >> for multiple versions of HTTP; or, an alternative service might >> itself advertise an alternative. > > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-alt-svc-07#section-2.4> > > Do we need any more discussion here, or can we close the issue? > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 00:57:45 UTC