- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:30:06 -0700
- To: Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 12 June 2015 at 01:32, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de> wrote: > In that spirit the client should use the alternate service as URL when > looking up which proxy to use in a PAC file. But what is the corresponding > URL to use, e.g. should http://www.service.com:443/, > https://www.service.com/ or http_opportunistic_security://www.service.com/ > be used? Actually, I think not. That means that proxies could become the source of routing problems for users, but the right way to address this is to have the proxy understand alternative services. Or to provide additional inputs, either to the CONNECT request or the query to proxy.pac.
Received on Friday, 12 June 2015 16:30:34 UTC