Daniel, I don't think you're asking the right question. The procedure for requesting review of a new prefer header proposal is already clear in RFC 7240, Section 5.1 (where the text you quote is from). I think what you mean to be doing here is following that procedure by sending a filled-out template (along with a reference to the draft it's being put into), and asking for review of that. No? Barry On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com > wrote: > Hi, > > > > We would like to provide recommendation on how to proceed to register a > new Prefer Header and get expert review for that new header. Would you > agree with the following text: > > > > “Registration requests should be sent to the <ietf-http-wg@w3.org> > mailing list, marked clearly in the subject line (e.g., "NEW PREFERENCE - > example" to register an "example" preference).” > > > > BR, > > Daniel > > > > > > [image: Ericsson] <http://www.ericsson.com/> > > *DANIEL MIGAULT * > Researcher > Research > > > *Ericsson* > 8500 Boulevard Decarie > H4P 2N2 Montreal, Canada > Phone +1 514 345 7900 46628 > Mobile +1 514 452 2160 > daniel.migault@ericsson.com > www.ericsson.com > > > > [image: http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign] > <http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign> > > > > Legal entity: Ericsson Canada Inc., registered office in Montreal. This > Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis > of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer >
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 15:23:35 UTC