Re: Stephen Farrell's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpbis-tunnel-protocol-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[ paring down CC: list ]

> On 10 Jun 2015, at 7:09 am, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I wonder if it would be helpful to explicitly motivate it — i.e., say this header is there to make the information available at the HTTP layer during CONNECT, so that the server can refuse the connection gracefully if they like (e.g., with a 403); without it, the server would have to sniff ALPN in the tunnel and then close the connection rudely.
> 
> I think that we're going to need some review on this change.
> 
> https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/a62c60a

Looks OK to me - others?

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2015 05:21:45 UTC