Re: Bad link in RFC 7234

This is a problem with the tools.ietf.org rfcmarkup tool and nothing to
do with the RFC itself.

Comments on that should probably be directed to tools-discuss@ietf.org.

    Tony Hansen

On 4/29/15 4:09 PM, Will Sargent wrote:
> In https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-4.2.2
>
>  "heuristics can only be used on responses without explicit freshness
>  whose status codes are defined as cacheable by default (see Section
>  6.1 of [RFC7231])"
>
> The link marking "Section 6.1" has a URL
> of https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-6.1 -- it should
> be https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-6.1 instead.
>
> Will.
>

Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2015 20:26:07 UTC