Re: Proposed HTTP SEARCH method update

> Seems like it would be more useful to define a basic plain-text search
format that could be widely used for typical "site search" functionality?

Agreed on Michael's this point

Plus, the `limit`, `sort` and etc. are the common props that we are used at
most of query languages(SQL/noSQL), maybe we can define them in request
headers? and it would could optimize and simplify the query statement for
common use.

And from this spec, perhaps needs more examples or specs for detailing the
"conditional SEARCH" and related stuffs. But James, thanks for your work,
most of things are clear enough and learned much from your work :)

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 1:52 AM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's not so much an extension to WebDAV SEARCH as a complete
> redefinition of the SEARCH method. It can still be used in WebDAV but
> could be used in places WebDAV isn't.
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote:
> > James,
> >
> >> On Apr 10, 2015, at 12:00 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please see: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-snell-search-method/
> >>
> >> Comments welcome.
> >
> > Seems like all this is currently defining is a generic extension to the
> WebDAV SEARCH method without actually defining an extension that can be
> used.  Seems like it would be more useful to define a basic plain-text
> search format that could be widely used for typical "site search"
> functionality?
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
> >
>
>


-- 
Yorkie Liu
https://github.com/yorkie
+18600219033