- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:57:04 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2015-03-17 08:12, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2015-03-12 03:30, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Hi Amos, >> >> The changelog is removed before the RFC is published, so I think we're >> OK there. >> >> WRT the text, I think we can fix that by adding an equivalent proviso >> to proxy-auth-info, e.g.,: >> >> """ >> The Proxy-Authentication-Info response header field is equivalent to >> Authentication-Info, except that its semantics are defined by the >> authentication scheme indicated by the Proxy-Authorization header >> field of the corresponding request, and applies to proxy authentication. >> """ >> >> We can do that as part of LC processing (we just wanted to get this >> change in before that because of the change IPR declaration). > > Done in > <https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/commit/f06bc492259a5a7762fdc168bffa736dc5afcc3c>. > > > Best regards, Julian So IETF LC is over, and the IESG is already processing the document as of -04, without the above change. I'll thus submit this as -05, hoping that we don't disrupt the IESG's evaluation process :-) Best regards, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 14:57:38 UTC