Results of calls for adoption

Not hearing any objection (once the scope of 5987bis was clarified), we’ll adopt the following as WG drafts:

* draft-reschke-rfc5987bis —> draft-httpbis-rfc5987bis
* draft-reschke-http-cice —> draft-httpbis-cice
* draft-tbray-http-legally-restricted-status —> draft-httpbis-legally-restricted-status

Julian, could you please add your drafts to the http-extensions repo?

Tim, I’ve added you to the editors team on Github, so you should be able to check in your XML source (or Markdown, if you use it) to:
  https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions

Feel free to ask me, Julian and Martin for help, especially regarding integration into the Travis build system (which is Martin’s specialty).

Once we get that sorted out, we can publish -00 drafts.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 04:24:20 UTC