Re: SNI requirement for H2

On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:06:36PM -0700, Roberto Peon wrote:
> Does anyone recall why 6066 has no SNI for IP literals? (It could be an
> empty SNI field or the SNI could indicate the IP literal)?

I find it surprizing as well, given that NAT/reverse proxy is very common
in front of servers and that the address specified in the URL bar (hence in
the SNI if it were sent) would be authoritative and would not necessarily
match the one the server sees on the local socket.


Received on Friday, 3 April 2015 19:25:58 UTC