Re: h2 implementation list -- PLEASE UPDATE

Mark,

Do we also list h2c and h2c-14 etc. ?

Also, I couldn't help my OC self and sorted the table.

cheers




On 2 April 2015 at 13:26, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> Right.
>
> The most common values will be “h2” and “h2-14” (because 14 is the last
> implementation draft we nominated, and is what most implementations use
> today AFAICT).
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 2 Apr 2015, at 1:15 pm, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 1 April 2015 at 18:58, Max Bruce <max.bruce12@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Is draft 17 the final? I never found an actual finalized RFC.
> >
> > The RFC editor is working on -17.  There will be no technical changes
> > between that and the final document.
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>


-- 
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>  @  Webtide - *an Intalio subsidiary*
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.