On 27 November 2014 at 09:28, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > > <snip> > > But other than than old lost battle.... I think the send/recv > clarifications are good ones. Not such a big fan of the use of the word > "either", which looks like it applies to the frame type and not to the send > or recv. Maybe "send/recv" would be better than "either". > > > I agree, the word "either" isn't great. Since the space in the diagram is so limited, I'd be tempted to suggest symbols for send/recv/both. However that would get messy fast. Why not leave out the "either", and reorder the two ambigious cases: "R / send ES", "R / recv ES" ? If that's too finicky, this PR is still an improvement. -- Matthew Kerwin http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 23:51:36 UTC