- From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 15:28:15 -0600
- To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Cc: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>, Andy Green <andy@warmcat.com>, Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net>, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> On Nov 25, 2014, at 3:17 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 25 November 2014 at 11:55, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> What is the benefit to preventing reframing? The negative of such a restriction is that intermediaries will be unable to utilize their knowledge of their network topology to improve performance. > > > It would appear that Yukata and Andy want to use HTTP/2 frame > boundaries as the basis for WS frame boundaries. That implies that > you need to prevent blind reframing. Since reframing is an inherent > part of HTTP/2, I note that this would be unwise. (And for more than > just the reasons you describe.) Could you elaborate? -- Jason T. Greene WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 21:29:56 UTC