FWIW, the diff is long, but that happens when you renumber figures. And virtually all of the changes are editorial in nature [1]. While it is always true that any document would benefit from more review, my sense is that we could spend another 6 months, find a continuous stream of minor niggles, and still be in the same state. Of course, we would be 6 months less relevant too. The substantial technical issues stopped a while back. It is past time to move on. [1] I probably need to add to the change log. I'm in the process of doing a check. On Mon, Nov 24, 2014, 03:22 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: < http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-latest-from-wglc.diff.html > < http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-header-compression-latest-from-previous.diff.html > So yes, the diffs aren't small at all :-)
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 21:54:48 UTC