- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 06:02:21 +0000
- To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- cc: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <CACweHNA5Og8-2i__zdJ8ddVubXmjLGPjru-tw8oiQBSVnWWACw@mail.gmail.com>, Matthew Kerwin writes: >So I guess your preference is gzip? Yes, because it comes with a command line tool whereas libz doesn't. The extra few bytes of header is worth that IMO. >I have no problem with reducing it to just gzip, say. I've also had a >request for LZ4, Now that I could possibly understand, but compress ? No. You may want to think about making the first one, which ever one you choose mandatory to ensure interop. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Saturday, 22 November 2014 06:16:07 UTC