- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 05:37:08 +1300
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21/11/2014 8:33 p.m., Matthew Kerwin wrote: > Since things seem to be settling down now, with most changes > seemingly editorial, and most implementations presumably moving > towards debug (rather than implement) mode, I feel like once again > broaching the topic of encoded (read: compressed) DATA frames. > > The current version of my "encoded data" draft is < > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kerwin-http2-encoded-data-03> > > It includes a reference to another idea I had < > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kerwin-http2-segments-01> to which > I'm not exactly married -- I'd be happy to keep it, roll it into > the encoded-data draft, or just drop it. > > My question is: is anyone else interested in pursuing/implementing > encoded data? Do you think it's worthwhile me continuing to plug > away at it? > I am intending to implement encoded data or some close variant for Squid. Just procrastinating a bit on the basic h2 parts. Amos -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUb2ouAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjIsQH/2qKHJXJK8hMFx+32FPlPfZk wkvFzzeVfLfgMme8NiOI/AISzK2sIKqxiWyKOny6/W726Pd9xQ4vEL5H1Zy3aZz8 XI6Yuh7C5dNcUz2hpm1z8Ru3vuwVDnQHbsact5wPyM9A63Xwb0+RcYjTNLw58bll r7wd3AkQgF7h411318pWP0F7YwiAPEMgvcyZMstUnwWxyHn88V166InwFUii16RL RTZR3jVEMFDd4247cMmP5R9xhrbmpnlNzAsEhJy8cIHCZobUIhPzkSfKFTBK4NKE EbKZZU3yHwEur1/YQH+fv1dAEh4ERPh3sjDih5VUnRGMebw1T3A73paKs7el+Qs= =Mfal -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 16:37:57 UTC