- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:05:56 +1100
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Hey Greg, Good question. I'm going to review the discussion and hopefully declare consensus on 9.2.2 today (my time). We also have <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/645>, but I think that's just a matter of making a detailed proposal and getting the text in; I don't imagine it'll be controversial. Once Martin is back, we'll roll h2-16 and hpack-10. While the diffs between h2-14 and the purported -16 are not small, I think the bulk of them are editorial, and the larger changes are well-understood by the Working Group, so another WGLC is not necessary. Likewise for hpack-10. That said, we'll take at least a few days to make sure everyone understand the changes and has a chance to read through. Assuming we get through that, I'll declare consensus to ship h2-16 and hpack-10 to the IESG, where IETF LC will begin. Regards, > On 21 Nov 2014, at 10:39 am, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote: > > > What is the rough plan from here? > > A h2-16 draft? then? > > > > > -- > Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> @ Webtide - an Intalio subsidiary > http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales > http://www.webtide.com advice and support for jetty and cometd. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 21 November 2014 01:06:28 UTC