- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:06:37 +0000
- To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Roland Zink <roland@zinks.de>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <20141117163914.GA14542@1wt.eu>, Willy Tarreau writes: >That's exactly what I hate in the "tls everywhere" model : I think the major mistake in "tls everywhere" is that while the OSI models protocols sucked, the basic idea of layering did not. IMO the HTTP/2.0 spec shouldn't mention encryption or TLS with a single word, making it robust for future changes in transport or encryption technologies and policies. By welding HTTP/2.0 to TLS (as hard as they can), the "tls everywhere" crowd is effectively making it harder to replace TLS with something better in due time. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 17 November 2014 17:07:04 UTC