- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 13:15:38 +1100
- To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@mozilla.com>
It sounds like we have consensus to do this, with some editorial input. Marking editor-ready. > On 12 Nov 2014, at 12:33 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > This was discussed in the Honolulu meeting; it seemed reasonable to people in the room and there was no objection. > > Any last thoughts on the list? Otherwise, I’ll mark as editor-ready so Martin can integrate the pull request. > > Cheers, > > >> On 5 Nov 2014, at 2:28 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >> >> There seems to be some support for this, so I've created <https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/issues/642>. >> >> As you all know, we need to see substantial support and little (if any) dissent to take this kind of change at this point in the process. >> >> Anyone else care to comment? >> >> The proposal is: >> >>> Make it so that PRIORITY can be sent on a stream in ANY state. >>> i.e., change so that PRIORITY is permitted in the "idle" state. >> >> >> Martin, please start work on a pull so people can take a look. >> >> >>> On 6 Nov 2014, at 2:35 am, Roberto Peon <grmocg@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> SGTM-- moving this from unreliable to reliable behavior seems like a definite win for intermediaries, and potentially others. >>> -=R >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Ilya Grigorik <igrigorik@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: >>> What do other people think about the general idea? >>> >>> I like it. I think it moves the discussion from "you could bend the protocol to do this assuming you have a cooperating client+server", which is not something we can reasonably rely on as a browser, to a plausible "PRIORITY is allowed on idle stream, treat such streams as 'group anchors'"... i.e. allowing priority on idle stream means servers *must* deal with this case, which makes using and deploying such mechanism much more plausible. >>> >>> ig >>> >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ >> >> > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > > > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 17 November 2014 02:16:06 UTC