Re: #612: 9.2.2 and ALPN

On 13 November 2014 16:03, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is one piece of collateral damage here that I think we will have
> to decide on.  The draft previously has requirements for key strength
> on DHE and ECDHE.  I've moved that to 9.2.1.  I want to make sure that
> I call that out.

On consideration (and feedback on github), I've changed this to
include permission to use INADEQUATE_SECURITY in the case that the
minimum key sizes are not negotiated.

Received on Friday, 14 November 2014 03:12:40 UTC