- From: Moto Ishizawa <summerwind.jp@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:52:24 +0900
- To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2014 14:53:12 UTC
+1 I think that advertising the both of h2-14 and h2-15 is better. 2014-11-13 21:59 GMT+09:00 Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa <tatsuhiro.t@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > We've been doing interop using h2-14 ALPN ID for a while. > Some client/server now only advertise h2-15, others do both h2-14 and > h2-15. > Since draft-15 is binary compatible to h2-14, for code simplicity and > interop, it would be better to stick to h2-14, unless we introduce binary > incompatible changes in the future draft. > > Thoughts? > > Current status of ALPN ID usage: > Firefox nightly: h2-14, h2-15 > Chrome canary: h2-15 > Google server: h2-15 > Twitter: h2-14 > nghttp2: h2-14 > > Best regards, > Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa > >
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2014 14:53:12 UTC