Re: #612: 9.2.2 and ALPN

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:

> I assume that there is an implied:
>
>   BAD = peer MAY fallback to h1 (if able to influence ALPN protocol
> selection)
>
> and that will not be seen as a downgrade attack (or at least and
> acceptable one).
>

Can you explain why this would be desirable? It sure sounds like a
downgrade attack path to me.