- From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 00:59:43 -0500
- To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
- Cc: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, simon.schueppel@googlemail.com, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
This seems to be a correct report: the grammar supports OWS before or after a comma, but not before the first element or after the last. Julian? Barry On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 7:20 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7230, > "Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7230&eid=4169 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Simon Schueppel <simon.schueppel@googlemail.com> > > Section: 7 > > Original Text > ------------- > #element => [ ( "," / element ) *( OWS "," [ OWS element ] ) ] > > 1#element => *( "," OWS ) element *( OWS "," [ OWS element ] ) > > Empty elements do not contribute to the count of elements present. > For example, given these ABNF productions: > > example-list = 1#example-list-elmt > example-list-elmt = token ; see Section 3.2.6 > > Then the following are valid values for example-list (not including > the double quotes, which are present for delimitation only): > > "foo,bar" > "foo ,bar," > "foo , ,bar,charlie " > > Corrected Text > -------------- > #element => [ ( "," / element ) *( OWS "," [ OWS element ] ) ] > > 1#element => *( "," OWS ) element *( OWS "," [ OWS element ] ) > > Empty elements do not contribute to the count of elements present. > For example, given these ABNF productions: > > example-list = 1#example-list-elmt > example-list-elmt = token ; see Section 3.2.6 > > Then the following are valid values for example-list (not including > the double quotes, which are present for delimitation only): > > "foo,bar" > "foo ,bar," > "foo , ,bar,charlie" > > Notes > ----- > "foo , ,bar,charlie " cannot be derived from 1#token (legacy list rule) > "foo , ,bar,charlie" can be derived from 1#token (legacy list rule) > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7230 (draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-26) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing > Publication Date : June 2014 > Author(s) : R. Fielding, Ed., J. Reschke, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Hypertext Transfer Protocol Bis > Area : Applications > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > >
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 06:00:11 UTC