Re: impact of 9.2.2 changes and discussions on opportunistic encryption draft

On 31 October 2014 11:56, Erik Nygren <erik@nygren.org> wrote:
> If everyone sticks with #1 or #2 and only uses #3 for the HTTP-TLS case
> we're fine.


That's not an *if*, that's a *requirement*.  You can't have a
situation where both peers have different expectations regarding a
critical feature like authentication.

If -encryption fails to make that clear, let's work on that.

Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 20:02:06 UTC