Re: #612: 9.2.2 requirements

Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com> wrote:

> Until the proper TLS APIs exist (I’m not holding my breath), or TLS 1.3
> occurs, this is the best action an implementer can take.


Also, this working group decided a long time ago that it is reasonable to
require TLS implementations to be changed to support HTTP/2. In fact, this
working group actually required *every* TLS implementation to be changed to
support ALPN, even though many of them would have worked fine, unmodified,
with the NPN support that they already had. So, the argument that changes
to TLS implementations may need to be modified has already been decided to
be invalid.

Cheers,
Brian