Re: #612: 9.2.2 requirements

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
wrote:

>
> Ilari’s use case is a great example of where it all goes wrong:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2014OctDec/0167.html
>

I believe that just describes an API limitation, not a protocol problem. A
hypothetical implementation directly participated in the negotiation of XYZ
and h2 but for whatever reason cannot ensure the relevant properties of XYZ
with respect to h2's application profile of tls laid out in 9.2.

-Patrick

Received on Friday, 31 October 2014 21:14:51 UTC