- From: Louis Ryan <lryan@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 20:31:12 +0000
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 16:49:09 UTC
Was the intent of the edit https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/commit/52c32efea314ca6bd504be6f08e91e895add7bc9 to prohibit 0x0 & 0xa in scenarios where a proxy or server is not interpreting HTTP2 as HTTP/1.1? The language is certainly stronger than the earlier version. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-14#section-10.3 which seems only to apply to the HTTP2 -> HTTP/1.1 case. Encoding efficiency questions aside why not predicate this constraint on either the :scheme being http/https or the proxies desire to interpret some other :scheme as http.
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 16:49:09 UTC