Re: #578: getting real-ish numbers for option 3

On 27 October 2014 21:43, Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz> wrote:
> Statistical significance is (N >= 0.05) .

I think that this is a good time to remind people that we aren't
looking for perfection.  The reference set provides a far better
compression gain than anything I've seen in this thread, in any case.
We dropped that due to concerns over complexity.

We've always said that we are merely looking for a robust and
efficient compression scheme, not a perfect one.

Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2014 04:56:10 UTC