Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7230 (4136) from Barry Leiba on 2014-10-21 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from October to December 2014)

From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:27:27 -0400
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "frank@gevaerts.be" <frank@gevaerts.be>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CALaySJKooA04c_=q5tB=aZsuotRquZB8gRXNYKu-OzdmrtjEvg@mail.gmail.com>

That was my sense from re-reading it now, as well.  I will mark this report
as "Rejected", with a note that the comment refers to Section 3.3.2 as a
whole.

Barry

On Tuesday, October 21, 2014, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
wrote:

> On 2014-10-21 02:25, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
>> Julian, Roy... is that item meant to refer to what's in 3.3.3 bullet
>> 5, or does it refer to something else?
>>
>> Barry
>>
>
> No, the RFC text is correct. We are really talking about 3.3.2.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>

Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 12:27:59 UTC