Re: Straw Poll: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices

On 10/15/14, 9:10 AM, "Simpson, Robby (GE Energy Management)"
<robby.simpson@ge.com> wrote:


>On 10/15/14, 7:31 AM, "RUELLAN Herve" <Herve.Ruellan@crf.canon.fr> wrote:
>
>
>>For responses, there are also two: "date" and "via". Their impact is
>>roughly the same, and significant only for 1K or 2K dynamic tables.
>>Keeping or removing them depends on the tradeoff we want to make. For a
>>generic web usage, keep them to gain a small compaction increase, for a
>>more versatile usage, remove them to reduce the size of the static table.
>
>"date" is an interesting example.  It is a MUST unless an accurate clock
>is available (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231#section-7.1.1.2), yet it
>is only 4 characters with a very dynamic value.
>
>As I come from an embedded perspective, every bit counts and since this is
>a MUST, I would suggest we keep it.  But this is not a strong opinion.

*unavailable

Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2014 13:40:49 UTC