- From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 07:28:47 +0200
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Shigeki Ohtsu <ohtsu@iij.ad.jp>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:24:45PM +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote: > That's not where we're at, Greg. > > The current stance on changing the static table was that we'd do so *if* > we've agreed to make other breaking changes. But Mark, people's experience differ depending on the environment where they deploy the protocol, so that means that the current status is too white or too black and that possibly making it a little bit grayer would make it more suitable for most environments. I don't see what's wrong with considering feedbacks from real deployments, *even at this stage*. Otherwise that means testers are useless and we should just work on paper with a wet finger in the wind. Willy, confused.
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 05:29:19 UTC