Re: Question about HTTP 2.0 priority

On 6 October 2014 16:01, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com> wrote:
> I think a lot of experimentation is needed and that it is worthwhile giving
> the tree model a go.... but it would be good if we also had a fall back to
> simple absolute values that could be used to communicate a partial ordering.
> Would it be worthwhile to explicitly say that streams can be given weights
> against a dependency on stream 0, which would then act as an absolute
> priority declaration?

When we discussed this, we decided that we'd do almost that, but leave
the weighting scheme intact.  That's going to be suboptimal, but if
weights are artificially exaggerated by a server, the net effect is
not too dissimilar.

Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2014 00:28:51 UTC