Re: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices

Also prefer to not switch back.

On 7 October 2014 06:58, Ludin, Stephen <sludin@akamai.com> wrote:

> -1 from me as well.  I can editorialize if need be but I will be rehashing
> what others are saying.
>
> -stephen
>
> From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
> Date: Monday, October 6, 2014 at 11:44 AM
> To: "Kulkarni, Saurabh" <sakulkar@akamai.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>, Jeff Pinner <
> jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Restore Header Table and Static Table Indices
> Resent-From: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Monday, October 6, 2014 at 11:44 AM
>
> --------
> In message <D0582ED8.B1E9%sakulkar@akamai.com>, "Kulkarni, Saurabh"
> writes:
>
> Same here, -1 on this. Our implementation (Akamai server) is much simpler
> now because of this.
>
>
> Same here: -1 on this.
>
> Having the static table first is much simpler and no credible data
> has shown that putting the dynamic table first will lead to overall
> improvement of compression.
>
> And if compression is that important, we can get much more of it by
> compressing timestamps algorithmically than by flipping these two
> tables.
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
>
>


-- 
Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
http://eclipse.org/jetty HTTP, SPDY, Websocket server and client that scales
http://www.webtide.com  advice and support for jetty and cometd.