- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 18:44:30 +0000
- To: "Kulkarni, Saurabh" <sakulkar@akamai.com>
- cc: Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>, Jeff Pinner <jpinner@twitter.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
-------- In message <D0582ED8.B1E9%sakulkar@akamai.com>, "Kulkarni, Saurabh" writes: >Same here, -1 on this. Our implementation (Akamai server) is much simpler >now because of this. Same here: -1 on this. Having the static table first is much simpler and no credible data has shown that putting the dynamic table first will lead to overall improvement of compression. And if compression is that important, we can get much more of it by compressing timestamps algorithmically than by flipping these two tables. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Monday, 6 October 2014 18:44:55 UTC