Re: END_SEGMENT? (#397) from Martin Thomson on 2014-06-30 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from April to June 2014)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:20:30 -0700
To: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWK5+B8v5ZFBCcZNd0B4zKfT=3h_8_cKYvAcbsbtbhzww@mail.gmail.com>

On 30 June 2014 10:06, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Special-purpose proxies can ignore any part of the protocol that their designer knows will not occur in the local environment. It’s not a normative issue.

That's an argument for the new application negotiation token.

> Fully conforming proxies should support interactive applications.

That's an argument against the new application negotiation token.

Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 17:20:57 UTC