W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: END_SEGMENT? (#397)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 10:20:30 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWK5+B8v5ZFBCcZNd0B4zKfT=3h_8_cKYvAcbsbtbhzww@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Sommermann <dcsommer@fb.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 30 June 2014 10:06, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Special-purpose proxies can ignore any part of the protocol that their designer knows will not occur in the local environment. It’s not a normative issue.

That's an argument for the new application negotiation token.

> Fully conforming proxies should support interactive applications.

That's an argument against the new application negotiation token.
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 17:20:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC