Re: END_SEGMENT? (#397)

On 30 June 2014 09:54, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote:
> “Tackle”? It’s an editorial issue, and reviewing GitHub it essentially boils down to specifying what sort of flush should occur.
>
> I don’t think anyone’s talking about removing END_SEGMENT or WebSocket support. It’s essential to interactive applications, including the sort of things that WebSockets often does. This is something all proxies should handle going forward.

I think that people are.  From some perspectives, END_SEGMENT is cruft
and WebSocket support isn't present.  From the other perspective,
thewebsocketprotocol can be shoehorned in and that's good enough.

Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 17:01:34 UTC