- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:19:07 -0700
- To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 30 June 2014 02:29, Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote: > In case of using just one token (i.e. "webrtc"), then I think what is > misleading for me is the header name. IMHO if we are talking about > protocols, they are ice and turn, if we are talking about webrtc, then it is > something different. How about Tunneled-Application or > Tunneled-Application-Protocol? It's still a protocol. But I have no objection to the former, some small objection to the latter, but only with respect to verbosity.
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 16:19:36 UTC