- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:23:37 +0200
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote: > Do you have any evidence that accepting anything but CRLF is needed in > practice? If yes, we'd probably want to add something to the prose about the > message format. I thought the party line was rough consensus and running code? The most widely deployed clients exhibit this behavior. I doubt they're willing to change that, but I guess you can try make them during conformance testing. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 12:38:55 UTC