W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: CRLF requirement

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 14:23:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78g5Fs2DxeYb5KKPDJ8DJc4MMZD8STKO0=_ohbK_VibBHQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Do you have any evidence that accepting anything but CRLF is needed in
> practice? If yes, we'd probably want to add something to the prose about the
> message format.

I thought the party line was rough consensus and running code? The
most widely deployed clients exhibit this behavior. I doubt they're
willing to change that, but I guess you can try make them during
conformance testing.

Received on Monday, 30 June 2014 12:38:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC