W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: Jason Greene <jason.greene@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 13:31:41 -0500
Cc: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3C910256-6CAC-4886-8E80-BD1BF08DABC9@redhat.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>

On Jun 27, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 27 June 2014 11:05, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote:
>>> b) you receive a CONTINUATION frame?
>> 
>> 413
> 
> And the header compression state changes it might contain?  Or are you
> setting the header table to size 0

Even if you set table size to 0 you still have to process them before you can return a 413, since the setting is delayed. and you might get them before it takes effect. Only way to not process them is GOAWAY + close.

--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 18:32:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC