- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:05:41 -0700
- To: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
- Cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 27 June 2014 09:45, Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> wrote: > FWIW, my current HTTP/2 implementation does not support continuation > headers, for the simple reason that 99.9999% of our users do not need > extremely large header support (for ActiveDirectory/RFC 4559 deployments). Just to clarify behaviour: what do you do when: a) you are asked to transmit more headers than will fit in a single frame through your API? b) you receive a CONTINUATION frame?
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 17:06:08 UTC