- From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:35:50 -0700
- To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 27 June 2014 02:50, Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote: > If the protocol is ICE-TCP, why is it labeled as webrtc? Shouldn't it be > better, and most consistent to use "ice" as value instead? I think that's a point of confusion. The intent is to do webrtc, or something that is compatible with webrtc. ICE, and ICE-TCP, are just a small part of what is being done here. ICE isn't inherently useful, after all.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 16:36:17 UTC