W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: draft-hutton-httpbis-connect-protocol-00.txt

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:35:50 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW62779JEhfDrkevUJRcF38w=2gED2wCghptJdiROD8fA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 27 June 2014 02:50, Sergio Garcia Murillo
<sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the protocol is ICE-TCP, why is it labeled as webrtc? Shouldn't it be
> better, and most consistent to use "ice" as value instead?

I think that's a point of confusion.  The intent is to do webrtc, or
something that is compatible with webrtc.  ICE, and ICE-TCP, are just
a small part of what is being done here.  ICE isn't inherently useful,
after all.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 16:36:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC