W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: CONTINUATION was: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:57:26 +0000
To: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3716.1403863046@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAFWmRJ1LEvKV9O3KWSx6rXeNts3h4UHEgF9OBL3LrfciZVMgsw@mail.gmail.com>
, Simone Bordet writes:

>There is large majority of the people intervening in this thread that
>is against CONTINUATIONS are they are defined now, and I am one of
>them.

Count Varnish as one of these.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2014 09:57:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC