- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 07:00:54 +0000
- To: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
- cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CACweHNBGP2sd069AsoZoxL9pbm=f_s7q4MqKqGCrmpEcxFhL=A@mail.gmail.com> , Matthew Kerwin writes: >I think the current term for those sorts of optional features is >"extensions." If you drafted a good one, I wouldn't oppose its adoption by >the wg. Getting rid of the CONTINUATION kludge is not an extension, that's a vast improvement and reduction of complexity in the proposed protocol. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 07:01:17 UTC