Re: #540: "jumbo" frames

In message <CACweHNBGP2sd069AsoZoxL9pbm=f_s7q4MqKqGCrmpEcxFhL=A@mail.gmail.com>
, Matthew Kerwin writes:

>I think the current term for those sorts of optional features is
>"extensions." If you drafted a good one, I wouldn't oppose its adoption by
>the wg.

Getting rid of the CONTINUATION kludge is not an extension, that's a vast
improvement and reduction of complexity in the proposed protocol.


-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 07:01:17 UTC