W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 06:05:15 +0000
To: Gabriel Montenegro <Gabriel.Montenegro@microsoft.com>
cc: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <31586.1403762715@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <d5baf0349a844a90a7c19e7955ce3e60@BN1PR03MB072.namprd03.prod.outlook
.com>, Gabriel Montenegro writes:

>NYC interim discussions were very clear about not churning any more before
>WG LC unless something was completely broken.  We don't think that is the
>case here, especially as an extension would allow folks to experiment with
>jumbo frames for data if they so wish.

I beg to differ:  CONTINUATION is horribly broken.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 06:05:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC