W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:09:41 +0000
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <30303.1403734181@critter.freebsd.dk>
In message <CAH_y2NGNCsKkhbmog-RXQ5PLefzjMRUkUOyee=fFbBbkxiFfxg@mail.gmail.com>
, Greg Wilkins writes:

>Continuations are jumbo frames!  They are just really bad jumbo frames that
>only apply to headers, can't be efficiently handled and don't have a
>mechanism for end points to pre declare max acceptable sizes.   General
>jumbo frames would handle the headers use-case, but also provide a solution
>for those who need efficient large data.

My view exactly.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 22:10:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC