- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:09:41 +0000
- To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>
- cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
In message <CAH_y2NGNCsKkhbmog-RXQ5PLefzjMRUkUOyee=fFbBbkxiFfxg@mail.gmail.com> , Greg Wilkins writes: >Continuations are jumbo frames! They are just really bad jumbo frames that >only apply to headers, can't be efficiently handled and don't have a >mechanism for end points to pre declare max acceptable sizes. General >jumbo frames would handle the headers use-case, but also provide a solution >for those who need efficient large data. My view exactly. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 22:10:05 UTC