W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

RE: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: <K.Morgan@iaea.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:08:45 +0000
To: <grmocg@gmail.com>, <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
CC: <mike@belshe.com>, <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, <mnot@mnot.net>, <w@1wt.eu>, <gregw@intalio.com>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <0356EBBE092D394F9291DA01E8D28EC201186F5A25@sem002pd>
On 25 June 2014 22:26, grmocg@gmail.com wrote:
> I'll note that I work at YouTube, and care deeply about video distribution... and I'm not worried about it.
> As a matter of fact, I'd really, really like to take advantage of the prioritization scheme along with smaller
> frames so that I can have better codecs in the future which do much better adaptive stuff w.r.t. bandwidth
> changes.
> This matters far more to me.

And nothing about the jumbo frames proposal is stopping you.


> As it turns out, our users care deeply about the quality of their experience.

This is such a ridiculous snark I'm at a loss how to even respond.

This email message is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Information contained in this email message and its attachments may be privileged, confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication to others. Also please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 21:09:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC