- From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 19:17:30 +0000
- To: Nicholas Hurley <hurley@todesschaf.org>
- cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, K.Morgan@iaea.org, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, IETF HTTP WG <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
In message <CANV5PPV30o6bWWF=QS7SBxmqs_pc-fCB5ZQncja8T94M5F1FWA@mail.gmail.com> , Nicholas Hurley writes: >I'm not convinced by the arguments around large file downloads - those are >the exception rather than the rule. Optimize for the common case. In HTTP, >that means viable multiplexing and priority, both of which are much more >effective with frame size limited to 16k like we have it now. Large in this context is "Larger than 16 kilobytes" and those are the norm, not the exception. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 19:17:53 UTC