W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: #540: "jumbo" frames

From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:36:03 +0900
Message-ID: <53AA89F3.9020004@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: Greg Wilkins <gregw@intalio.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On 2014/06/25 17:01, Greg Wilkins wrote:

> The minus of jumbo frames is it makes sending huge headers a little harder
> as you have to completely encode to know the length before you start
> sending them.  Decoding can still be streamed if you really want.

In the sense that this discourages large headers, that would actually be 
a benefit.

Regards,   Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 08:36:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC