W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2014

Re: Ops advice

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:55:26 +1000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C8BDFD3D-5B97-4ECC-BF2E-E82E170CE4BE@mnot.net>
To: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com>

On 22 Jun 2014, at 10:04 am, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.cole@gmail.com> wrote:

> Great start! Two things came to mind.
> First, it still references the AltSvc frame. Should it do that or reference the header? An example could help reinforce since this practice is new either way.

Depends on the scenario; if you're already in HTTP/2, the frame is probably preferable (since you don't have to wait for a request).

> Second, there's a suggestion to use reasonable sized frames. With http frames being 16383, in what scenario is that unreasonably large?

AIUI anytime it might potentially block other frames from being delivered. If people who have experimented with this would be willing to talk about their results on the wiki, I'm sure it'd be greatly appreciated.

> Thanks for the help! I will reference this guide at my http2 talk at uberconf next weds.

No worries.

And remember -- it's a wiki! :)

> -A
> On Jun 19, 2014 8:51 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> I've taken the content of the http2-ops draft and put it here:
>   https://github.com/http2/http2-spec/wiki/Ops
> Will Chan also donated some text from the SPDY wiki, which I've started to incorporate.
> Please feel free to tweak, add suggestions, etc. I'll link this from the HTTP/2 home page momentarily.
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 06:55:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:14:31 UTC