- From: Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:01:05 +1200
- To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 24/06/2014 7:14 p.m., David Krauss wrote: > > On 2014–06–24, at 3:08 PM, David Krauss <potswa@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Also, stream initiation order is not preserved by intermediaries, so TCP’s guarantee is not strong enough. > > Oops, that’s too pathological to be possible. Still, PRIORITY has a purpose, although it might need a trial period as an extension. > More accurately middleware can potentially be load balancing a given set of streams over N backend servers. Any one of which at low-priority may respond faster than a "high" priority server. Leading to sub-optimal response frame ordering on the client connection regardless of request sent order. Amos
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 08:01:38 UTC